Saturday, September 30, 2006

Hale Street Link (Brisbane Transport)

Part of my purpose in life is to support the change in society which will allow us to have a safe, peacefull and prosperous future. My immediate concern is climate change and the human causes of that. Despite all the evidence as to our impact on the life on this planet, the people on this planet power on with business as usual. This post addresses the concern that we blindly continue to build roads and encourage the increase in private transport, where we know that the world cannot currently sustain the amount of greenhouse gases being released and that we must achieve a 60% reduction in greenhoue gases by 2050. Specifically it is a submission during the Impact Assessment Statement public consultation period on the Hale Street Link proposal. See Hale Street Link September 2006 newsletter for information, and the Community flyer with arguments for and against the development.

Following is my submission based on the template provided by Communities against the Hale Street Link. I encourage everyone to put in their submission against this development.




IAS Submission
Hale Street Link Project
GHD Pty Ltd
GPO Box 668
BRISBANE Q 4001


Hale Street Link Project IAS Submission

Dear Sir/Madam.

I oppose the HSL project, on the following grounds.


  • We must accept Climate Change and adapt. If this city, country and world wishes to remain prosperous then we must reduce our greenhouse gases output by 60% by 2050 (The Australian Sept 30, 2006). Creating the infrastructure that is the Hale Street Link (and the TransApex project in general (also see the Wikipedia article)) will only encourage more private transport (this is supported by the Brisbane City Council’s Hale Street Link public information posted to residents). Residents should be encouraged to use public transport - the Brisbane City Council (BCC) and State Government should put funds into improving and increasing the public transport in Brisbane and South East Queensland.

  • This project would solve no real problems. It’s not needed or wanted by local residents and would do nothing to solve Brisbane’s traffic congestion problems. Instead it would shift existing traffic congestion south of the river and actually worsen congestion city wide by inducing more private motor vehicle traffic. Any short term improvements in travel times would soon disappear. Another road bridge so close to the CBD and all the other bridges is an ineffective and wastefully expensive way to try and relieve congestion experienced for only a few hours each week.

  • Investing in better public transport would ease peak hour demand far more, and have a much greater impact on citywide congestion. An adequately resourced public transport system, combined with measures and facilities to encourage more walking and cycling for shorter trips, demand management (especially for special events) and other measures to reduce nonessential use of private motor vehicles (including car pooling and car sharing schemes) has been proven worldwide to fix traffic congestion. Getting commuters out of their cars frees up our roads. Apart from a being cheaper and more effective solution, it’s also more environmentally sustainable.

  • Improved cross river connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists is already being addressed by the planned Tank Street pedestrian/cycle bridge and one or more extra City Cat terminals. Another pedestrian/cycle bridge would be much cheaper and greener than HSL.

  • The negative impacts of the project are serious and the mitigation measures proposed are inadequate. In particular the health and safety hazards to school children and others close to the traffic and associated exhaust emissions haven’t been properly assessed or addressed.

  • The commercial viability of the project is doubtful and exposes all Brisbane ratepayers to unacceptable risk. Many of the assumptions in the Business Case and IAS are outdated (oil prices), wishful thinking (exhaust emissions), or highly questionable (costings of mitigation measures). Increased costs or reduced demand would mean higher rates, higher tolls, or both.

  • The hidden ‘downstream’ costs of the health and congestion problems would be met by the State Government and therefore all taxpayers. The Business Case is invalid because it is not based on the true and complete whole of project cost.

  • The project conflicts with existing State Government and Council strategies, including Queensland Transport’s Integrated Regional Transport Plan (IRTP) for South East Queensland.

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Steve Irwin's Memorial Service

I won't write in great detail about the events of today's service, since others can find information on this, such as:


Instead I'll just present my observations of the day. I attended the service with Jodie G. We received VIP tickets from the Wildlife Warriors as the Environment Committee at work, of which I am the chairman, have been working with the Wildlife Warriors.

I must give a massive congratulations to Queensland Rail. They offerred free transport for those attending the service which saved maybe $10 or more. And they had a number of special return services, one of which we were able to make despite farging around after the service getting a coffee.

I caught the train at 06:07 and it took 2 hrs to get us to Beerwah and then to Australia Zoo after a short bus ride. Jodie was in a separate section of the train and I met her on the platform.

Jodie had a big wreath the Environment Committee had bought. It was made up of natives and plastic snakes and crocodiles, which we left with Wildlife Warriors. We filed into the VIP area. Unfortunately we were behind a post which made it difficult to see everything. I sat next to Shelley who is a member of the QLD Frog Society. I discussed Walk Against Warming with her and she was fully in support of it. I asked her to see our supporters site Climate_Action_Brisbane - I am part of the group that is organising the walk). Jodie sat next to Eyvonne Chapman who is the Pine Rivers Mayor. Jodie and her shared a hanky to mop up all the tears shed over the loss of Steve. Also present were Prime Minister John Howard, Senator Ian Campbell, Tim Fischer (Chair of Tourism Australia), Kim Beazley (Opposition Leader), Governor General of Australia (I think), Peter Beattie (QLD State Premier) and the Irwin family (Steve's father Bob, wife Terri, kids Bindy and Bob).

There were video messages from Russel Crowe, Cameron Diaz, Larry King, Hugh Jackman ... and Kelly Ripa (who is she and what relationship did she have with Steve? She made it sound like she's only met him a couple times. Surely there could have been many more people that would have been better to give messages. I suggest that this was driven by the US television networks. Someone else can follow this up if they like). Wez Mannon - The Directory of Australia Zoo and Steve's best mate. Steve saved him from a croc (when they were filming) and Wez cried at the end - "He saved my life. I'll miss you mate."

Professor Craig Franklin gave a speech to say he's been working with Steve on the conservation of crocks and scientific research into their lives. Steve was certainly a person that was working positively for the Environment.

Bob Irwin Snr gave a talk and it was very moving. All through the day they peppered the show with scenes of Steve in action and most were extremely amusing. Especially the one after handling a croc and it busted one of his ribs. He said how happy he is to achieved his aim and that "My job is complete". What a character and we're all going to miss him so much.

David Wenham read out hte poem THE CROCODILES ARE CRYING. That link looks awfully tenuous and so I will copy the poem:



THE CROCODILES ARE CRYING



Endless visions fill my head - this man - as large as life And instantly my heart mourns for his angels and his wife Because the way I see Steve Irwin - just put everything aside It comes back to his family - it comes back to his pride

His animals inclusive - Crikey - light the place with love! Shine his star with everything he fought to rise above The crazy-man of Khaki from the day he left the pouch Living out his dream and in that classic 'Stevo' crouch

Exploding forth with character and redefining cheek It's one thing to be honoured as a champion unique It's one thing to have microphones and spotlight cameras shoved It's another to be taken in and genuinely loved

But that was where he had it right - I guess he always knew From his fathers' modest reptile park and then Australia Zoo We cringed at times and shook our heads - but true to natures call There was something very Irwin in the make up of us all

Yes the more I care to think of it - the more he had it right If you're going to make a difference - make it big and make it bright! Yes - he was a lunatic! Yes - he went head first! But he made the world feel happy with his energetic burst

A world so large and loyal that it's hard to comprehend I doubt we truly count the warmth until life meets an end To count it now I say a prayer with words of inspiration May the spotlight shine forever on his dream for conservation

…My daughter broke the news to me - my six year old in tears It was like she'd just turned old enough to show her honest fears I tried to make some sense of it but whilst her Dad was trying His little girl explained it best…she said "The crocodiles are crying"

Their best mate's up in heaven now - the crocs up there are smiling! And as sure as flowers, poems and cards and memories are piling As sure as we'll continue with the trademarks of his spiel Of all the tributes worthy - he was rough…but he was real

As sure as 'Crikey!' fills the sky I think we'll miss ya Steve…goodbye

RUPERT McCALL 2006



What ended the show was amazing. First there was the release of Black Cockatoos and Rosellas (you only saw 1/2 a second of this on the video shown by all the networks). Apparantly this is done all the time at Australia Zoo. They flew around the Croc-o-seum, resting on people's heads (just the rosellas) and beams. They were there for 5 mins before being called back by their trainers. Then finally Steve's Ute was "driven away for the last time" by Steve's Croc-trainer or co-hand with the Crocs. That was a very teary moment. Finally there was a minute of unannounced silence before the show ended at five minutes past 10. It ran 5 minutes over time and thus why you didn't see the birds - farg I hate commercial television.

On the way out I ducked back in down near the stage and saw in big writing "1962 - 2006" under the big picture of Steve and it brought a flood of tears to my eyes. I didn't really know the man, why am I so sad at his loss?

The day was so well coordinated, coreographed and organised. I, like everyone else was very impressed. Only 2 things spoilt the day which happened independantly of the service. The coffee, which I lined up 1/2 hr to get and cost me $4.10 was the worst made cappachino I'd ever tasted. The milk was boiled and bruised and not frothy. It tasted ok at the end after it cooled down. The other was that there are no recycling facilities at Australia Zoo, which suprised me given how forceful Steve was on the conservation issue.

There was one more highlight of the day. Kym Beazley, the opposition leader was out chatting to the people. It wasn't that Kym was there, but rather that he was there when John Howard had departed as swiftly as possible in his own private (Commonwealth) Limo.

I'd like to end with a final farewell to Steve Irwin - so long mate and thanks for all the fish (that have been fed to Crocs). There will never be another like you. And well done to Queensland Rail for running a free service to and from Australia Zoo. If only more people would use these services and get out of their cars. At Beerwah Station was a sign showing that the weekly train ticket from Beerwah costs $56, but to drive a car would cost $115 and that is just the fuel costs and not the wear and tear on the vehicle and the carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases cost.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Brisbane Public Transport

Sorry for the break between posts. I've been so flat out cleaning up my mum's place in Sydney (we're putting it up for rent) and with Climate Action Brisbane (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Climate_Action_Brisbane/) amongst other stuff.

I wrote a letter that I discussed doing in travelsmart brisbane despite tunnel blog post, however i haven't sent it. My partner edited for me and I haven't got around to fixing it up. And it's sort of a bit late now, though I'm sure another opportunity will come up.

An opportunity did arise though I didn't send that letter and instead formulated a new one. Actually, the opportunity was with the
Deputy Mayor, Council David Hinchliffe
sending out a survey on Brisbane's Public Transport. What an opportunity! Presented below is my response to the survey (fortunately I could email a response).




From: brooke
Subject: Public Transport for Brisbane
Date: 21 August 2006 23:44:53 GMT+10:00
To: central.ward@ecn.net.au
Cc: Brooke@Tintuna.com

Gidday David,

Thankyou for giving us the opportunity of expressing our views about
Brisbane's Public Transport. It'd be great if you could supply this (or
rather, future surveys) as web forms.

Name: Brooke
Address: New Farm 4005

Q1. Which is the best way for Council to invest your rates to reduce traffic
congestion? Please rate 1-5.


1 - Fast and reliable public transport
2 - Safe bike and pedestrian pathways
3 - Tolled bridges
4 - Tolled Tunnels
5 - Upgraded roads

Q2. Have you ever been left behind at a bus or ferry stop?


Yes, though its very rare down the Southern end of New Farm near where the
buses start from. However I read some reports of this at
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,20112994-3102,00.html

Q3. If fuel prices continue to rise will this influence you to catch more
public transport?


Yes, though I never need to drive to work (in the city), however if I did then,
yes the increasing fuel prices would influence me to catch more public
transport.

Q4. Which of the following would encourage you to use public transport more
often?


1 - High frequency services
2 - Electronic ticketing
3 - More express and rocket services
4 - More busways

Q5. Do you suppot Council buying more buses and ferries?


Yes

Q6. Other comments?



The number one thing that needs to change to improve public tranport is the Trans Apex Brisbane roads project - it needs to be canned. Building more roads will only encourage more cars and given the cost of this project, the council will most likely need to reduce Public Transport funding (or not to improve its services). This would create a situation where the public are being forced to drive as they will have no better alternative. I have been following the Council's busway improvements and I congradulate you all on them (though I'm a little sceptical that it will work out as well as envisioned due to the costs of the roads project. It was suggested about the Sydney Tunnel and Roads development that the public transport services were reduced so people would drive and pay the tolls. I'd hate to think this is true and would not like it to happen in my town).

My suggestion is to save the money and put it into creating a wicked public transport system. Create extended train lines, light rail, connections between all modes of transport and encourage a greater community spirit. Simple things would make such a differenence - light rail from the New Farm City Cat terminal (ie. New Farm park which receives thousands of cars each weekend), along Brunswick St that is always chockers with cars, to the Brunswick St stations and onto the Royal Brisbane Hospital / Royal Show Grounds. Do the same Light Rail connections for Suncorp Stadium and Milton Station, down along Park Rd and along to the Regatta Point City Cat stop. The point of these suggestions is to make the improvements visible, make them connect the public transport systems, make use of efficient, visible and interesting light rail and build the structures to encourage people to interact in their daily lives. Build shopping centers, other commercial property and residential developments around public transport hubs - train and light rail stations, and bus interchanges. Ultimately, give the public a choice and more than this, build infrastructure to encourage Public Transport use and a greater community spirit. I'm not a civil engineer or architect and I'm sure some decent ones could come up with some fantastic plans.

All the best in the studies and fingers crossed that we get improved Public Transport. I do apologise for sounding pushy and offside against car-based city designs. Though it is true - too many of the cities around the world are car based and we need to see that change as soon as possible. Hydrogen is a long way away and will not save us.

Cheers,

Brooke



I think there is a business opportunity in the vision of developments around public transport terminuses. If you agree and would like to help me persue this, drop me a line / comment.